<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alson Kemp &#187; Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alsonkemp.com/category/tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alsonkemp.com</link>
	<description>Hackfoofery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 18:18:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NXDom rocks&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/nxdom-rocks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/nxdom-rocks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alsonkemp.com/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of months ago, Johann Rocholl announced NXDom.  Basically, Johann created an algorithm to build millions of likely-to-be-interesting possible domain names and then queried DNS servers to see if the servers knew of the possible domain names.  Any domains that got NX (non-existent domain) responses from DNS servers were entered into the NXDom database [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of months ago, Johann Rocholl <a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1075953" target="_blank">announced</a> <a href="http://www.nxdom.com" target="_blank">NXDom</a>.  Basically, Johann created an algorithm to build<strong> millions</strong> of likely-to-be-interesting possible domain names and then queried DNS servers to see if the servers knew of the possible domain names.  Any domains that got NX (non-existent domain) responses from DNS servers were entered into the NXDom database as available.  Johann added a nice query interface and, voila!, changed how I search for domains.</p>

<h3>Search for Domains V1</h3>

<p>I don&#8217;t have any particular recipe for searching for domains, but I do something like:</p>

<ol>
    <li>Think about my target market.</li>
    <li>Think up a few keywords.</li>
    <li>Try the keywords at http://www.instantdomainsearch.com.</li>
    <li>Find most are registered.</li>
    <li>Think up other less interesting keywords&#8230;</li>
    <li>Find one kinda crappy domain name that isn&#8217;t registered and register it because I&#8217;m frustrated&#8230;</li>
    <li>Dwell on the fact that I had a crappy domain name&#8230;</li>
</ol>

<h3>Search for Domains V2 (New and Improved with NXDom)</h3>

<ol>
    <li>Think about my target market.</li>
    <li>Think up a few keywords.</li>
    <li>Try the keywords at NXDom.</li>
    <li>See 300 results for each keyword.</li>
    <li>See lots of possibilities for great domains for each keyword.</li>
    <li>Register a great domain (making sure to click the NXDom affiliate link so that Johann gets his rev share).</li>
    <li>Dwell on my super cool domain.</li>
</ol>

<p>The best part of NXDom is that it works very well for very popular terms.  A friend is in the CFO business, so we searched on domains ending in &#8220;CFO&#8221; and found numerous interesting domains:
<img width="700px" src="http://www.alsonkemp.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Selection_002.png" alt="" /></p>

<h3>FWIW</h3>

<p>I don&#8217;t know Johann and I have no affiliation with NXDom.  Everyone to whom I show NXDom gets wide-eyed and starts thinking up domain ideas, so I figured that I&#8217;d share more broadly.  NXDom has certainly changed, and greatly improved, the way I search for domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/nxdom-rocks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HighCharts, Bluff, gRaphael &#8211; Javascript charting libraries</title>
		<link>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/highcharts-javascript-charting-library/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/highcharts-javascript-charting-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alsonkemp.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bumped into HighCharts today.  See here: http://highcharts.com Very nice library for embedding charts into your HTML.  Nice to see that browsers are finally getting to the point that HighCharts can be written.   Also, it&#8217;s nice to think about being able to dump Flash charting solutions in favor of a simple Javascript library.  Worth the $80 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bumped into HighCharts today.  See here: <a href="http://highcharts.com" target="_blank">http://highcharts.com</a> Very nice library for embedding charts into your HTML.  Nice to see that browsers are finally getting to the point that HighCharts can be written.   Also, it&#8217;s nice to think about being able to dump Flash charting solutions in favor of a simple Javascript library.  Worth the $80 for commercial use (I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;ve spent well more than $80 of my time wrestling with an open source Flash charting library).</p>

<hr />

<p>[Updating post to add more libs.]</p>

<p>Okay.  I got called out for not poking around a bit more.  There are nice open-source, liberally licensed JS chart libs.</p>

<h3>Open Source</h3>

<p><a href="http://bluff.jcoglan.com" target="_blank">Bluff</a> : Ruby&#8217;s <a href="http://nubyonrails.com/pages/gruff" target="_blank">Gruff</a> ported to JS.  Looks pretty straightforward.</p>

<p><a href="http://g.raphaeljs.com/" target="_blank">gRaphael</a> : built on the awesome Raphael JS vector graphics library.  Limited functionality, but that&#8217;ll change.</p>

<p><a href="http://dragan.yourtree.org/code/canvas-3d-graph/" target="_blank">Canvas3D</a> : super cool, but not sure if it&#8217;s ready for a production site&#8230;</p>

<p><a href="http://www.jqplot.com" target="_blank">jqPlot</a> : charting for jQuery.  I&#8217;m neither pro- nor con-jQuery, so I&#8217;m not sure that I&#8217;d pick a jQuery-centric library.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.liquidx.net/plotkit/" target="_blank">PlotKit</a> : dependent on MochiKit.</p>

<p><a href="http://code.google.com/p/flot/" target="_blank">Flot</a> : charting for jQuery.  Again, since I use different JS libraries in different circumstances/apps, I&#8217;m not excited about having to pull in jQuery, but Flot looks nice.</p>

<h3>Commercial License</h3>

<p><a href="http://www.jscharts.com/" target="_blank">JSCharts</a> : HighCharts looks prettier&#8230;  $129 for a license for all of your sites (vs. $360 for <a href="http://highcharts.com" target="_blank">HighCharts</a>)</p>

<p><a href="http://www.ejschart.com" target="_blank">Emprise Charts</a> : Very nice.  Pricing is inline with JSCharts and HighCharts.</p>

<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 113px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">http://www.liquidx.net/plotkit/</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/highcharts-javascript-charting-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pretty Firefox: &#8216;Chrome Package&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/pretty-firefox-chrome-package/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/pretty-firefox-chrome-package/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alsonkemp.com/uncategorized/pretty-firefox-chrome-package/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m comfortable with Firefox.  Stable, loads of developer tools, etc., but Google&#8217;s Chrome looks awful nice and is screen space efficient.  Fortunately, some lovely fellow has made a Firefox add-on to make Firefox look like Chrome:

Chrome Package

This add-on hides the Firefox toolbar (as opposed to Chromifox, which only provides colors and images).
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m comfortable with Firefox.  Stable, loads of developer tools, etc., but Google&#8217;s Chrome looks awful nice and is screen space efficient.  Fortunately, some lovely fellow has made a Firefox add-on to make Firefox look like Chrome:</p>

<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8790">Chrome Package</a></p>

<p>This add-on hides the Firefox toolbar (as opposed to <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8782" target="_blank">Chromifox</a>, which only provides colors and images).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alsonkemp.com/tools/pretty-firefox-chrome-package/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
